In a major legal turning point, a judge has set Donald Trump’s sentencing in the hush-money case for January 10, just days ahead of his scheduled presidential inauguration. The case centers on allegations tied to a payment made to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election campaign.
New York Justice Juan Merchan announced that Trump, found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records, will face an “unconditional discharge,” meaning he will avoid prison time, probation, or financial penalties. Trump will have the option to attend the sentencing either in person or via a virtual appearance.
The president-elect has publicly condemned the case, taking to social media to label the judge’s ruling as a “rigged farce” and a “blatant political maneuver.” Trump continues to assert his innocence, portraying the case as a deliberate effort to derail his political ambitions.
The charges stem from a $130,000 payment arranged by Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, to silence Daniels regarding an alleged affair. Trump has consistently denied the affair and pleaded not guilty, claiming the case is a politically motivated attack. His legal team attempted to have the charges dismissed, arguing that the trial could interfere with his duties as president, but the court rejected their plea.
Justice Merchan also dismissed Trump’s argument for presidential immunity, though he acknowledged alternatives such as postponing the sentencing until after Trump’s term or ensuring a non-custodial outcome. Previous Supreme Court rulings on presidential immunity have further complicated the legal landscape.
This hush-money case is one of four criminal cases Trump is currently navigating. Other charges include mishandling classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. Despite these ongoing legal challenges, Trump remains a divisive figure as he prepares to re-enter the White House.
The upcoming sentencing represents a historic moment, making Trump the first U.S. president-elect with a criminal conviction. The broader implications of these legal battles on his presidency and legacy remain a subject of intense debate nationwide.